Andrew v. White
145 S. Ct. 75 · Decided January 21, 2025 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Andrew v. White was decided on January 21, 2025 by a vote of 7–2. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Extra-legal jury influences, prejudicial statements or evidence” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2024
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 23-6573
Case details
- Citations
- 145 S. Ct. 75 · 220 L. Ed. 2d 340 · 2025 U.S. LEXIS 406
- Docket number
- 23-6573
- Decided
- January 21, 2025
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (no oral argument)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Dissent | |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Majority | |
| Justice Amy Coney Barrett | Majority | |
| Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson | Majority |
Full case caption
Andrew v. White
SCDB identifiers: case 2024-067, docket 2024-067-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Extra-legal jury influences, prejudicial statements or evidence”
- Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado
- Donnelly v. Dechristoforo
- Loper v. Beto
- Fontaine v. California
- Anderson v. Nelson
- Pinto v. Pierce
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Glossip v. Oklahoma
- Gutierrez v. Saenz
- Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
- Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health OrganizationAltered precedent
- Ford Motor Company v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court
- June Medical Services LLC v. RussoLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Hamm v. Smith
- Williams v. Reed
- Delligatti v. United States
- Thompson v. United States
- Bondi v. Vanderstok
- Barnes v. Felix
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error