CaseTrail

Anita Alvarez v. Chermane Smith

558 U.S. 87 · Decided December 8, 2009 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Anita Alvarez v. Chermane Smith was decided on December 8, 2009 by a vote of 8–1. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Mootness” in the Judicial Power area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
558 U.S. 87 · 130 S. Ct. 576 · 175 L. Ed. 2d 447 · 2009 U.S. LEXIS 8941
Docket number
08-351
Decided
December 8, 2009
Argued
October 14, 2009
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Vacated and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
8–1
Majority opinion
Stephen G. Breyer
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Mootness
Issue area
Judicial Power
Legal provision
Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
Type of law
Constitution
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Anita Alvarez, Cook County State's Attorney v. Chermane Smith et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 2009-002, docket 2009-002-01.

Other cases on “Mootness”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)

Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error