Anita Alvarez v. Chermane Smith
558 U.S. 87 · Decided December 8, 2009 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Anita Alvarez v. Chermane Smith was decided on December 8, 2009 by a vote of 8–1. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Mootness” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 558 U.S. 87 · 130 S. Ct. 576 · 175 L. Ed. 2d 447 · 2009 U.S. LEXIS 8941
- Docket number
- 08-351
- Decided
- December 8, 2009
- Argued
- October 14, 2009
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Stephen G. Breyer
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Mootness
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority |
Full case caption
Anita Alvarez, Cook County State's Attorney v. Chermane Smith et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 2009-002, docket 2009-002-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Mootness”
- Avron J. Arave v. Maxwell Hoffman
- Mario Claiborne v. United States
- Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.
- United States v. Sanchez-Gomez
- Azar v. Garza
Cases on the same legal provision: Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Priscilla Summers v. Earth Island Institute
- Sprint Communs. Co., L.P. v. Apcc Servs.
- Bob Camreta v. Sarah Greene
- Carol Anne Bond v. United StatesAltered precedent
- Jay F. Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc.
- Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Joseph E. Corcoran v. Mark Levenhagen
- Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Norman Carpenter
- Pottawattamie County v. Curtis W. McGhee, Jr.
- Dennis Hollingsworth v. Kristin M. Perry
- The Hertz Corporation v. Melinda Friend
- Jamal Kiyemba v. Barack H. Obama
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error