CaseTrail

Arizona v. Hicks

480 U.S. 321 · Decided March 3, 1987 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Arizona v. Hicks was decided on March 3, 1987 by a vote of 6–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Search and seizure (general)” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
480 U.S. 321 · 107 S. Ct. 1149 · 94 L. Ed. 2d 347 · 1987 U.S. LEXIS 1056
Docket number
85-1027
Decided
March 3, 1987
Argued
December 8, 1986
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
6–3
Majority opinion
Antonin Scalia
Opinion assigned by
William J. Brennan Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
Fourth Amendment
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice William J. Brennan Jr.Majority
Justice Byron R. WhiteConcurrenceWrote an opinion
Justice Thurgood MarshallMajority
Justice Harry A. BlackmunMajority
Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr.DissentWrote an opinion
Chief Justice William H. RehnquistDissent
Justice John Paul StevensMajority
Justice Sandra Day O'ConnorDissentWrote an opinion
Justice Antonin ScaliaMajorityWrote an opinion

Full case caption

Arizona v. Hicks

SCDB identifiers: case 1986-047, docket 1986-047-01.

Other cases on “Search and seizure (general)”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fourth Amendment

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error