Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Co.
393 U.S. 87 · Decided November 12, 1968 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Co. was decided on November 12, 1968 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice William O. Douglas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Railroad regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 393 U.S. 87 · 89 S. Ct. 280 · 21 L. Ed. 2d 219 · 1968 U.S. LEXIS 2931
- Docket number
- 13
- Decided
- November 12, 1968
- Argued
- October 17, 1968
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- William O. Douglas
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Railroad regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Interstate Commerce Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Abe Fortas | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority |
Full case caption
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. et al. v. Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Co. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1968-009, docket 1968-009-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Railroad regulation”
- American Commercial Lines, Inc. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co.
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
- Western Pacific Railroad Co. v. United States
- Norfolk & Western Railroad Co. v. Nemitz
- United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Steel Corp.
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago
Cases on the same legal provision: Interstate Commerce Act
- City of Pottsville v. United States
- United States v. Dixie Highway Express, Inc.
- City of Chicago v. United States
- United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission
- American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight Service
- Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. v. United States
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Continental Oil Co. v. United States
- Whyy, Inc. v. Borough of GlassboroLaw held unconstitutional
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.
- Grunenthal v. Long Island Rail Road Co.
- United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error