Bank One Chicago, N. A. v. Midwest Bank & Trust Company
516 U.S. 264 · Decided January 17, 1996 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Bank One Chicago, N. A. v. Midwest Bank & Trust Company was decided on January 17, 1996 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Liability, miscellaneous” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 516 U.S. 264 · 116 S. Ct. 637 · 133 L. Ed. 2d 635 · 1996 U.S. LEXIS 693
- Docket number
- 94-1175
- Decided
- January 17, 1996
- Argued
- November 28, 1995
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Liability, miscellaneous
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- 12 U.S.C. § 4010
- Type of law
- Infrequently litigated statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Concurrence |
Full case caption
Bank One Chicago, N. A. v. Midwest Bank & Trust Company
SCDB identifiers: case 1995-019, docket 1995-019-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Liability, miscellaneous”
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Hiles
- Exxon Company, U. S. A. v. Sofec, Inc.
- Chandris, Inc. v. Antonios Latsis
- John W. Atherton, Jr. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
- Harbor Tug and Barge Company v. John Papai et Ux.
- Saratoga Fishing Company v. J. M. Martinac & Company and Marco Seattle Inc.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Citizens Bank of Maryland v. David Strumpf
- William Field and Norinne Field v. Philip W. Mans
- Yamaha Motor Corporation, U. S. A. v. Lucien B. Calhoun
- Marjorie Zicherman, Etc. v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd.
- Lotus Development Corporation v. Borland International, Inc.
- Fulton Corporation v. Janice H. FaulknerAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error