CaseTrail

Barbara Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.

517 U.S. 735 · Decided June 3, 1996 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Barbara Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A. was decided on June 3, 1996 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Judicial review of agency actions” in the Judicial Power area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
517 U.S. 735 · 116 S. Ct. 1730 · 135 L. Ed. 2d 25 · 1996 U.S. LEXIS 3594
Docket number
95-860
Decided
June 3, 1996
Argued
April 24, 1996
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Antonin Scalia
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Judicial Power
Legal provision
12 U.S.C. § 85
Type of law
Infrequently litigated statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Barbara Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.

SCDB identifiers: case 1995-058, docket 1995-058-01.

Other cases on “Judicial review of agency actions”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: 12 U.S.C. § 85

Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error