Barr v. City of Columbia
378 U.S. 146 · Decided June 22, 1964 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Barr v. City of Columbia was decided on June 22, 1964 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Hugo L. Black wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Sit-in demonstrations against racial discrimination” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 378 U.S. 146 · 84 S. Ct. 1734 · 12 L. Ed. 2d 766 · 1964 U.S. LEXIS 820
- Docket number
- 9
- Decided
- June 22, 1964
- Argued
- October 14, 1963
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Hugo L. Black
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Concurrence | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Arthur J. Goldberg | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Barr et al. v. City of Columbia
SCDB identifiers: case 1963-154, docket 1963-154-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Sit-in demonstrations against racial discrimination”
- Griffin v. Maryland
- Robinson v. Florida
- Bell v. Maryland
- Bouie v. City of Columbia
- Drews v. Maryland
- Green v. Virginia
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Jackson v. DennoAltered precedent
- Baggett v. BullittLaw held unconstitutional
- American Oil Co. v. NeillLaw held unconstitutional
- Armstrong v. Manzo et Ux.
- Holt v. Virginia
- Griswold v. ConnecticutLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Shockey v. Illinois
- Ausbie v. California
- Daegele v. Kansas
- Herrear v. Heinze
- Tabb v. California
- Foti v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error