Black v. Cutter Laboratories
351 U.S. 292 · Decided June 4, 1956 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Black v. Cutter Laboratories was decided on June 4, 1956 by a vote of 6–3. SCDB codes the disposition as “petition denied or appeal dismissed.” Justice Tom C. Clark wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “No merits, adequate non-federal grounds” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 351 U.S. 292 · 76 S. Ct. 824 · 100 L. Ed. 2d 1188 · 1956 U.S. LEXIS 1630
- Docket number
- 92
- Decided
- June 4, 1956
- Argued
- April 26, 1956
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Petition denied or appeal dismissed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Tom C. Clark
- Opinion assigned by
- Stanley F. Reed
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- No merits, adequate non-federal grounds
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Dissent | |
| Justice Stanley F. Reed | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sherman Minton | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Dissent | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority |
Full case caption
Black et al. v. Cutter Laboratories
SCDB identifiers: case 1955-088, docket 1955-088-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “No merits, adequate non-federal grounds”
- Durley v. Mayo
- Wilson v. Loew's Incorporated
- Edelman v. California
- Dixon v. Duffy
- Hammerstein v. Superior Court of California
- Roth v. Delano
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Walton v. California.
- Nukk v. Shaughnessy
- Affronti v. United States
- National Labor Relations Board v. Warren Company, Inc.
- Secretary of Agriculture v. United States
- Doud v. Hodge
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error