Blum v. Yaretsky
457 U.S. 991 · Decided June 25, 1982 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Blum v. Yaretsky was decided on June 25, 1982 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Poverty law, constitutional” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 457 U.S. 991 · 102 S. Ct. 2777 · 73 L. Ed. 2d 534 · 1982 U.S. LEXIS 141
- Docket number
- 80-1952
- Decided
- June 25, 1982
- Argued
- March 24, 1982
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- William H. Rehnquist
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Poverty law, constitutional
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority |
Full case caption
Blum, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al. v. Yaretsky et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1981-146, docket 1981-146-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Poverty law, constitutional”
- Schweiker v. Hogan
- Schweiker v. Wilson
- Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Florida Nursing Home Association
- United States Railroad Retirement Board v. Fritz
- Harris v. Rosario
- Califano v. WestcottLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Asarco Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionLaw held unconstitutional
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Taxation and Revenue Department of New MexicoLaw held unconstitutional
- Youngberg v. Romeo
- Insurance Corporation of Ireland, Ltd. v. Compagnie Des Bauxites de Guinee
- Greene v. LindseyLaw held unconstitutional
- Santosky v. KramerLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Chardon v. Fernandez
- Ralston v. Robinson
- Polk County v. Dodson
- Blanding v. Dubose
- Cabell v. Chavez-Salido
- Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error