California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
495 U.S. 490 · Decided May 21, 1990 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission was decided on May 21, 1990 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal preemption of state legislation or regulation” in the Federalism area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 495 U.S. 490 · 110 S. Ct. 2024 · 109 L. Ed. 2d 474 · 1990 U.S. LEXIS 2614
- Docket number
- 89-333
- Decided
- May 21, 1990
- Argued
- March 20, 1990
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Sandra Day O'Connor
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue area
- Federalism
- Legal provision
- Federal Power Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority |
Full case caption
California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1989-082, docket 1989-082-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal preemption of state legislation or regulation”
- Vera M. English v. General Electric Company
- Adams Fruit Co., Inc. v. Barrett
- FMC Corporation v. Cynthia Ann Holliday
- Ingersoll-Rand Company v. Perry McClendon
- Mansell v. Mansell
- Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. Ralph Mortier
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Power Act
- Arcadia v. Ohio Power Company
- Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Mississippi ex Rel. Moore
- Escondido Mutual Water Co. v. La Jolla Band of Mission Indians
- New York v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
- Federal Power Commission v. Conway Corp.
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Federal Power Commission
Same Term, same area (Federalism)
- Tafflin v. Levitt
- Adams Fruit Co., Inc. v. Barrett
- Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Donnelly
- United Steelworkers of America v. Rawson
- North Dakota v. United States
- Vera M. English v. General Electric Company
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error