Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing Co.
419 U.S. 245 · Decided December 18, 1974 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing Co. was decided on December 18, 1974 by a vote of 8–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Potter Stewart wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Libel and privacy (false light)” in the First Amendment area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 419 U.S. 245 · 95 S. Ct. 465 · 42 L. Ed. 2d 419 · 1974 U.S. LEXIS 158
- Docket number
- 73-5520
- Decided
- December 18, 1974
- Argued
- November 13, 1974
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Potter Stewart
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Libel and privacy (false light)
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority |
Full case caption
Cantrell et al. v. Forest City Publishing Co. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1974-012, docket 1974-012-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Libel and privacy (false light)”
- Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnLaw held unconstitutional
- Nixon v. Administrator of General Services
- Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.
- Time, Inc. v. Hill
- The Florida Star v. B. J. F.Law held unconstitutional
- Bartnicki v. VopperLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. Conrad
- Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. TornilloLaw held unconstitutional
- Old Dominion Branch No. 496 v. Austin
- Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.
- Spence v. WashingtonLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnLaw held unconstitutional
- Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. Conrad
- Meek v. PittengerLaw held unconstitutional
- Eastland v. United States Servicemen's Fund
- Bigelow v. VirginiaLaw held unconstitutional
- Cort v. Ash
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error