Carchman v. Nash
473 U.S. 716 · Decided July 2, 1985 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Carchman v. Nash was decided on July 2, 1985 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Harry A. Blackmun wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Subconstitutional fair procedure, evidence presentation or sufficiency” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 473 U.S. 716 · 105 S. Ct. 3401 · 87 L. Ed. 2d 516 · 1985 U.S. LEXIS 131
- Docket number
- 84-776
- Decided
- July 2, 1985
- Argued
- April 22, 1985
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Harry A. Blackmun
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Interstate compact
- Type of law
- Other
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority |
Full case caption
Carchman, Mercer County Prosecutor v. Nash
SCDB identifiers: case 1984-166, docket 1984-166-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Subconstitutional fair procedure, evidence presentation or sufficiency”
- Boag v. Macdougall
- Cuyler v. Adams
- United States v. John H. Williams, Jr.
- United States v. Anthony Salerno
- Moore v. United States
- Rogers v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Interstate compact
- Texas v. New Mexico
- Texas v. New Mexico
- States of Oklahoma and Texas v. State of New Mexico
- State of Oklahoma and State of Texas v. New Mexico
- State of New Jersey v. State of New York
- Nebraska v. Iowa
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Florida v. Rodriguez
- Thompson v. Louisiana
- Luce v. United States
- United States v. Abel
- United States v. Powell
- Garcia v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error