Carr v. Saul
141 S. Ct. 1352 · Decided April 22, 2021 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Carr v. Saul was decided on April 22, 2021 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Judicial review of agency actions” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2020
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 19-1442
Case details
- Citations
- 141 S. Ct. 1352 · 209 L. Ed. 2d 376 · 2021 U.S. LEXIS 2109
- Docket number
- 19-1442
- Decided
- April 22, 2021
- Argued
- March 3, 2021
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Judicial review of agency actions
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Article II, Section 2, Paragraph 2 (appointments clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Concurrence | |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Majority | |
| Justice Amy Coney Barrett | Concurrence |
Full case caption
Carr v. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
SCDB identifiers: case 2020-047, docket 2020-047-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Judicial review of agency actions”
- Babcock v. Kijakazi
- Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania
- Department of Commerce v. New York
- Kisor v. Wilkie
- Azar v. Allina Health Services
- Axon Enterprise v. Federal Trade Commission
Cases on the same legal provision: Article II, Section 2, Paragraph 2 (appointments clause)
- United States v. Arthrex Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Aurelius Investment, LLC
- Lucia v. SEC
- Kennedy v. Braidwood Management
- NLRB v. Noel Canning
- James D. Ryder v. United States
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Carney v. Adams
- Trump v. New York
- Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski
- BP P.L.C. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
- City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com, L.P.
- California v. Texas
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error