Carroll v. President and Commissioners of Princess Anne
393 U.S. 175 · Decided November 19, 1968 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Carroll v. President and Commissioners of Princess Anne was decided on November 19, 1968 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Abe Fortas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “First Amendment, miscellaneous” in the First Amendment area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 393 U.S. 175 · 89 S. Ct. 347 · 21 L. Ed. 2d 325 · 1968 U.S. LEXIS 2948
- Docket number
- 6
- Decided
- November 19, 1968
- Argued
- October 21, 1968
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Abe Fortas
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- First Amendment, miscellaneous
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Special concurrence | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Abe Fortas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority |
Full case caption
Carroll et al. v. President and Commissioners of Princess Anne et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1968-017, docket 1968-017-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “First Amendment, miscellaneous”
- Watts v. United States
- Amalgamated Food Employees Union Local 590 v. Logan Valley Plaza, Inc.
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
- Brandenburg v. OhioAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Teitel Film Corp. v. CusackLaw held unconstitutional
- United Mine Workers of America v. Illinois State Bar Association
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District
- Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham
- Stanley v. GeorgiaLaw held unconstitutional
- Street v. New YorkLaw held unconstitutional
- Lee Art Theatre, Inc. v. Virginia
- Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- Epperson v. ArkansasLaw held unconstitutional
- Clark v. Gabriel
- Presbyterian Church in the United States v. Mary Elizabeth Blue Hull Memorial Presbyterian Church
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District
- Gregory v. City of Chicago
- Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error