CaseTrail

Central Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Mealey

334 U.S. 653 · Decided June 14, 1948 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Central Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Mealey was decided on June 14, 1948 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Felix Frankfurter wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local government tax” in the Economic Activity area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
334 U.S. 653 · 68 S. Ct. 1260 · 92 L. Ed. 2d 1633 · 1948 U.S. LEXIS 1984
Docket number
14
Decided
June 14, 1948
Argued
October 13, 1947
Court era
Vinson Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
6–3
Majority opinion
Felix Frankfurter
Opinion assigned by
Hugo L. Black
How the case arrived
Appeal
Legal provision
Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
Type of law
Constitution
Held unconstitutional
A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Central Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Mealey et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1947-102, docket 1947-102-01.

Other cases on “State or local government tax”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error