CaseTrail

Chewning v. Cunningham

368 U.S. 443 · Decided February 19, 1962 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Chewning v. Cunningham was decided on February 19, 1962 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice William O. Douglas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Right to counsel” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
368 U.S. 443 · 82 S. Ct. 498 · 7 L. Ed. 2d 442 · 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1769
Docket number
63
Decided
February 19, 1962
Argued
December 4, 1961
Court era
Warren Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
William O. Douglas
Opinion assigned by
Earl Warren
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Right to counsel
Legal provision
Sixth Amendment (right to counsel)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Chewning v. Cunningham, Penitentiary Superintendent

SCDB identifiers: case 1961-031, docket 1961-031-01.

Other cases on “Right to counsel”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Sixth Amendment (right to counsel)

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error