Chiles v. Salazar
607 U.S. 627 · Decided March 31, 2026 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Chiles v. Salazar was decided on March 31, 2026 by a vote of 8–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Neil M. Gorsuch wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “First Amendment, miscellaneous” in the First Amendment area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 607 U.S. 627 · 146 S. Ct. 1010 · 224 L. Ed. 2d 446 · 2026 U.S. LEXIS 1565
- Docket number
- 24-539
- Decided
- March 31, 2026
- Argued
- October 7, 2025
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Neil M. Gorsuch
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- First Amendment, miscellaneous
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Concurrence | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Majority | |
| Justice Amy Coney Barrett | Majority | |
| Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Chiles v. Salazar
SCDB identifiers: case 2025-012, docket 2025-012-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “First Amendment, miscellaneous”
- Moody v. Netchoice, LLC
- Gonzalez v. Trevino
- Vidal v. Elster
- National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo
- Counterman v. Colorado
- United States v. Hansen
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Olivier v. City of Brandon
- National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election CommissionAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton
- Tiktok, Inc. v. Garland
- Lindke v. Freed
- O'Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- Olivier v. City of Brandon
- National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election CommissionAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error