City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency
145 S. Ct. 704 · Decided March 4, 2025 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency was decided on March 4, 2025 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Natural resources and environmental protection” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2024
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 23-753
Case details
- Citations
- 145 S. Ct. 704 · 221 L. Ed. 2d 166 · 2025 U.S. LEXIS 958
- Docket number
- 23-753
- Decided
- March 4, 2025
- Argued
- October 16, 2024
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Samuel A. Alito Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Natural resources and environmental protection
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Clean Water Act (Federal Water Pollution Control Act)
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Dissent | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Dissent | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Majority | |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Majority | |
| Justice Amy Coney Barrett | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson | Dissent |
Full case caption
City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency
SCDB identifiers: case 2024-008, docket 2024-008-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Natural resources and environmental protection”
- Seven County Infastructure Coalition v. Eagle County
- Loper Bright Enterprises v. RaimondoAltered precedent
- Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency
- Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency
- Guam v. United States
- U.S. Forest Service v. Cowpasture River Preservation Association
Cases on the same legal provision: Clean Water Act (Federal Water Pollution Control Act)
- National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense
- Entergy Corporation v. Riverkeeper, Inc.
- Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker
- Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (Toc), Inc.
- City of Burlington v. Ernest Dague, Sr.
- United States Department of Energy v. Ohio
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. Wullschleger
- Wisconsin Bell v. U.S.
- Republic of Hungary v. Simon
- Dewberry Group v. Dewberry Engineers
- United States v. Miller
- Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error