Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.
370 U.S. 690 · Decided June 25, 1962 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. was decided on June 25, 1962 unanimously (8–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 370 U.S. 690 · 82 S. Ct. 1404 · 8 L. Ed. 2d 777 · 1962 U.S. LEXIS 2293
- Docket number
- 304
- Decided
- June 25, 1962
- Argued
- April 16, 1962
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Byron R. White
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Antitrust
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Clayton Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Did not participate: Felix Frankfurter.
Full case caption
Continental Ore Co. et al. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1961-114, docket 1961-114-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Antitrust”
- United States v. Wise
- United States v. Borden Company
- Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Winckler & Smith Citrus Products Co.
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
- United States v. Loew's Incorporated
- Federal Trade Commission v. Henry Broch & Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Clayton Act
- United States v. Philadelphia National Bank
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.
- United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of America
- United States v. Penn-Olin Chemical Co.
- United States v. Continental Can Co.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Roper v. United States
- Martin v. Walton
- Still v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. J-T Transport Co., Inc.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Henry Broch & Co.
- United States v. Drum
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error