Cooper v. Harris
137 S. Ct. 1455 · Decided May 22, 2017 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Cooper v. Harris was decided on May 22, 2017 unanimously (8–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Elena Kagan wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Reapportionment (other than Voting Rights Act plans)” in the Civil Rights area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2016
Case details
- Citations
- 137 S. Ct. 1455 · 197 L. Ed. 2d 837 · 2017 U.S. LEXIS 3214
- Docket number
- 15-1262
- Decided
- May 22, 2017
- Argued
- December 5, 2016
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Elena Kagan
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Did not participate: Neil M. Gorsuch.
Full case caption
Cooper v. Harris
SCDB identifiers: case 2016-030, docket 2016-030-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Reapportionment (other than Voting Rights Act plans)”
- North Carolina v. Covington
- North Carolina v. Covington
- Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission
- Ala. Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama
- Rick Perry v. Shannon Perez
- Moore v. HarperLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Pavan v. SmithLaw held unconstitutional
- Bethune-Hill v. Va Bd. of Elections
- Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
- Foster v. Chatman
- Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission
- Evenwel v. Abbott
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Fry v. Napoleon Community Schools
- Bethune-Hill v. Va Bd. of Elections
- Endrew F. v. Douglas Cnty. Sch. Dist. RE-1
- Lewis v. Clarke
- Midland Funding LLC v. Johnson
- Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error