CaseTrail

Dale Farrar and Pat Smith v. William P. Hobby, Jr.

506 U.S. 103 · Decided December 14, 1992 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Dale Farrar and Pat Smith v. William P. Hobby, Jr. was decided on December 14, 1992 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Attorneys' and officials' fees, compensation, or licenses” in the Attorneys area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
506 U.S. 103 · 113 S. Ct. 566 · 121 L. Ed. 2d 494 · 1992 U.S. LEXIS 7846
Docket number
91-990
Decided
December 14, 1992
Argued
October 7, 1992
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
5–4
Majority opinion
Clarence Thomas
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Attorneys
Legal provision
Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Awards Act
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Dale Farrar and Pat Smith, Co-Administrators of Estate of Joseph D. Farrar, Deceased v. William P. Hobby, Jr.

SCDB identifiers: case 1992-010, docket 1992-010-01.

Other cases on “Attorneys' and officials' fees, compensation, or licenses”

See all

Same Term, same area (Attorneys)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error