CaseTrail

Demarcus Ali Sears v. Stephen Upton

561 U.S. 945 · Decided June 29, 2010 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Demarcus Ali Sears v. Stephen Upton was decided on June 29, 2010 by a vote of 5–4. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Right to counsel” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
561 U.S. 945 · 130 S. Ct. 3259 · 177 L. Ed. 2d 1025 · 2010 U.S. LEXIS 5540
Docket number
09-8854
Decided
June 29, 2010
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Per curiam (no oral argument)
Disposition
Vacated and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
5–4
Opinion assigned by
John Paul Stevens
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Right to counsel
Legal provision
Sixth Amendment (right to counsel)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Demarcus Ali Sears v. Stephen Upton, Warden

SCDB identifiers: case 2009-092, docket 2009-092-01.

Other cases on “Right to counsel”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Sixth Amendment (right to counsel)

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error