CaseTrail

Desert Palace, Inc. v. Catharina F. Costa

539 U.S. 90 · Decided June 9, 2003 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Desert Palace, Inc. v. Catharina F. Costa was decided on June 9, 2003 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Sex discrimination in employment” in the Civil Rights area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
539 U.S. 90 · 123 S. Ct. 2148 · 156 L. Ed. 2d 84 · 2003 U.S. LEXIS 4422
Docket number
02-679
Decided
June 9, 2003
Argued
April 21, 2003
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Clarence Thomas
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Civil Rights
Legal provision
Civil Rights Act of 1964 (other)
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Desert Palace, Inc., Dba Caesars Palace Hotel & Casino v. Catharina F. Costa

SCDB identifiers: case 2002-068, docket 2002-068-01.

Other cases on “Sex discrimination in employment”

See all

Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error