CaseTrail

Diamond v. Bradley

450 U.S. 381 · Decided March 9, 1981 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Diamond v. Bradley was decided on March 9, 1981 by a vote of 4–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. The Justices were equally divided, which leaves the lower court's judgment in place without setting precedent. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Patentability of computer processes” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
450 U.S. 381 · 101 S. Ct. 1495 · 67 L. Ed. 2d 311 · 1981 U.S. LEXIS 80
Docket number
79-855
Decided
March 9, 1981
Argued
October 14, 1980
Court era
Burger Court
Decision type
Equally divided vote
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
4–4
How the case arrived
Appeal
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice William J. Brennan Jr.Equally divided vote
Justice Potter StewartEqually divided vote
Justice Byron R. WhiteEqually divided vote
Justice Thurgood MarshallEqually divided vote
Chief Justice Warren E. BurgerEqually divided vote
Justice Harry A. BlackmunEqually divided vote
Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr.Equally divided vote
Justice John Paul StevensEqually divided vote

Did not participate: William H. Rehnquist.

Full case caption

Diamond, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks v. Bradley et Al

SCDB identifiers: case 1980-055, docket 1980-055-01.

Other cases on “Patentability of computer processes”

See all

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error