Dickinson v. Petroleum Conversion Corp.
338 U.S. 507 · Decided January 16, 1950 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Dickinson v. Petroleum Conversion Corp. was decided on January 16, 1950 by a vote of 7–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Robert H. Jackson wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Review of nonfinal orders” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 338 U.S. 507 · 70 S. Ct. 322 · 94 L. Ed. 2d 299 · 1950 U.S. LEXIS 2546
- Docket number
- 150
- Decided
- January 16, 1950
- Argued
- December 5, 1949
- Court era
- Vinson Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–1
- Majority opinion
- Robert H. Jackson
- Opinion assigned by
- Fred M. Vinson
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Review of nonfinal orders
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stanley F. Reed | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice Robert H. Jackson | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Justice Sherman Minton | Majority |
Did not participate: William O. Douglas.
Full case caption
Dickinson v. Petroleum Conversion Corp.
SCDB identifiers: case 1949-031, docket 1949-031-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Review of nonfinal orders”
- City of Morgantown v. Royal Insurance Co., Ltd.
- Republic Natural Gas Co. v. Oklahoma
- Gospel Army v. Los Angeles
- McCullough v. Kammerer Corporation
- Montgomery Building & Construction Trades Council v. Ledbetter Erection Co., Inc.
- Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. Bodinger
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Automatic Radio Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.
- Ackermann v. United States
- Klapprott v. United States
- Adkins v. E. I. Dupont de Nemours & Co., Inc. United States
- United States v. Moore et Ux.
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Roth v. Delano
- Graham v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen
- Boyd v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company
- Parker v. County of Los Angeles
- Hubsch v. United States
- United States v. Moorman
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error