East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. Rodriguez
431 U.S. 395 · Decided May 31, 1977 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. Rodriguez was decided on May 31, 1977 unanimously (9–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Potter Stewart wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal rules of civil procedure” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 431 U.S. 395 · 97 S. Ct. 1891 · 52 L. Ed. 2d 453 · 1977 U.S. LEXIS 94
- Docket number
- 75-718
- Decided
- May 31, 1977
- Argued
- January 10, 1977
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Potter Stewart
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Federal rules of civil procedure
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority |
Full case caption
East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. Rodriguez et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1976-113, docket 1976-113-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal rules of civil procedure”
- United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonald
- Donovan v. Penn Shipping Co., Inc.
- Browder v. Director
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesAltered precedent
- Bankers Trust Co. v. Mallis
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wetzel
- Board of School Commissioners of the City of Indianapolis v. Jacobs
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.
- Carter v. Stanton
- Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. Fox
- United States v. Reynolds et Ux.
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesAltered precedent
- Scott v. Kentucky Parole Board
- Massachusetts v. Feeney
- Tully v. Griffin, Inc.
- Belcher v. Stengel
- Cook v. Hudson
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error