Eastman Kodak Company v. Image Technical Services, Inc.
504 U.S. 451 · Decided June 8, 1992 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Eastman Kodak Company v. Image Technical Services, Inc. was decided on June 8, 1992 by a vote of 6–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Harry A. Blackmun wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 504 U.S. 451 · 112 S. Ct. 2072 · 119 L. Ed. 2d 265 · 1992 U.S. LEXIS 3405
- Docket number
- 90-1029
- Decided
- June 8, 1992
- Argued
- December 10, 1991
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Harry A. Blackmun
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Antitrust
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Dissent | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent |
Full case caption
Eastman Kodak Company v. Image Technical Services, Inc., et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1991-082, docket 1991-082-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Antitrust”
- Federal Trade Commission v. Ticor Title Insurance Company
- Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. Shirley McQuillan
- Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.
- Summit Health, Ltd. v. Simon J. Pinhas
- Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation
- Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. California
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Donald J. Willy v. Coastal Corporation
- Robert C. Rufo v. Inmates of the Suffolk County Jail
- William Lewis Smith v. Wayne S. Barry
- Charlene Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit
- Jill S. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc. and Michael Shipp
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Southwest Marine, Inc. v. Byron Gizoni
- Union Bank v. Herbert Wolas
- Kenneth Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Commission
- Hunter v. Bryant
- Shirley M. Molzof v. United States
- Aletha Dewsnup v. Louis L. Timm
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error