Elfbrandt v. Russell
384 U.S. 11 · Decided April 18, 1966 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Elfbrandt v. Russell was decided on April 18, 1966 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice William O. Douglas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Loyalty oath, government employees” in the First Amendment area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 384 U.S. 11 · 86 S. Ct. 1238 · 16 L. Ed. 2d 321 · 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1818
- Docket number
- 656
- Decided
- April 18, 1966
- Argued
- February 24, 1966
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- William O. Douglas
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Loyalty oath, government employees
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Dissent | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Abe Fortas | Majority |
Full case caption
Elfbrandt v. Russell et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1965-088, docket 1965-088-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Loyalty oath, government employees”
- Whitehill v. ElkinsLaw held unconstitutional
- Baggett v. BullittLaw held unconstitutional
- Cole v. Richardson
- Nostrand v. Little
- Cole v. Richardson
- Garner v. Board of Public Works of Los Angeles
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Pate v. Robinson
- Brown v. Louisiana
- Davis v. North Carolina
- Schmerber v. California
- Giaccio v. PennsylvaniaLaw held unconstitutional
- Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control BoardLaw held unconstitutional
- Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham
- Solomon v. South Carolina
- Rosenblatt v. Baer
- A Book Named 'john Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure' v. Attorney General of Massachusetts
- Ginzburg v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error