Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis
138 S. Ct. 1612 · Decided May 21, 2018 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis was decided on May 21, 2018 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Neil M. Gorsuch wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Arbitration in labor-management disputes” in the Unions area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2017
Case details
- Citations
- 138 S. Ct. 1612 · 200 L. Ed. 2d 889 · 2018 U.S. LEXIS 3086
- Docket number
- 16-285
- Decided
- May 21, 2018
- Argued
- October 2, 2017
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Neil M. Gorsuch
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Arbitration in labor-management disputes
- Issue area
- Unions
- Legal provision
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Dissent | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Dissent | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis
SCDB identifiers: case 2017-002, docket 2017-002-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Arbitration in labor-management disputes”
- New Prime Inc. v. Oliveira
- Lamps Plus Inc. v. Varela
- Badgerow v. Walters
- Morgan v. Sundance, Inc.
- Southwest Airlines Co. v. Saxon
- Viking River Cruises v. Moriana
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Arbitration Act
- Henry Schein Inc. v. Archer and White Sales Inc.
- Kindred Nursing Centers v. Clark
- Ge Energy Power Conversion France Sas v. Outokumpu Stainless USA LLC
- Directv, Inc. v. Imburgia
- Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski
- Coinbase v. Suski
Same Term, same area (Unions)
- Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro
- Janus v. American Federation of StateAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error