Esteban Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corporation
527 U.S. 815 · Decided June 23, 1999 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Esteban Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corporation was decided on June 23, 1999 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice David H. Souter wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal rules of civil procedure” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 527 U.S. 815 · 119 S. Ct. 2295 · 144 L. Ed. 2d 715 · 1999 U.S. LEXIS 4373
- Docket number
- 97-1704
- Decided
- June 23, 1999
- Argued
- December 8, 1998
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- David H. Souter
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Federal rules of civil procedure
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Concurrence | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Concurrence | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Esteban Ortiz, et al. v. Fibreboard Corporation, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1998-092, docket 1998-092-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal rules of civil procedure”
- Kumho Tire Company, Ltd. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc.
- General Electric Company v. Robert K. Joiner et Ux.
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. George Windsor
- Robert J. Devlin v. Robert A. Scardelletti
- Carrie Jaffee v. Mary Lu Redmond
- Lloyd Henderson v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Teresa L. Cunningham v. Hamilton County
- Chad Weisgram v. Marley Company
- United States v. Chris W. Beggerly
- Semtek International Incorporated v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
- Dale G. Becker v. Betty Montgomery
- Akos Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Sylvester Mosley v. United States
- Your Home Visiting Nurse Services, Inc. v. Donna E. Shalala
- The Federal Republic of Germany v. United States
- Kumho Tire Company, Ltd. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc.
- United States v. Jacinto Rodriguez-Moreno
- Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error