First National Bank of Arizona v. Cities Service Co.
391 U.S. 253 · Decided May 20, 1968 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
First National Bank of Arizona v. Cities Service Co. was decided on May 20, 1968 by a vote of 5–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Thurgood Marshall wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 391 U.S. 253 · 88 S. Ct. 1575 · 20 L. Ed. 2d 569 · 1968 U.S. LEXIS 2922
- Docket number
- 23
- Decided
- May 20, 1968
- Argued
- November 9, 1967
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–3
- Majority opinion
- Thurgood Marshall
- Opinion assigned by
- John M. Harlan II
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Antitrust
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Dissent | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Abe Fortas | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Did not participate: William O. Douglas.
Full case caption
First National Bank of Arizona v. Cities Service Co.
SCDB identifiers: case 1967-128, docket 1967-128-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Antitrust”
- United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.
- Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Fred Meyer, Inc.
- Albrecht v. Herald Co.
- Case-Swayne Co., Inc. v. Sunkist Growers, Inc.
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Lee v. WashingtonLaw held unconstitutional
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Patterson
- International Longshoremen's Association v. Philadelphia Marine Trade Association
- Snyder v. Harris
- United States v. Reynolds et Ux.
- Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corp.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Wyandotte Transportation Co. v. United States
- United States v. Penn-Olin Chemical Co.
- Burke v. Ford
- Tcherepnin v. Knight
- Case-Swayne Co., Inc. v. Sunkist Growers, Inc.
- City of Pottsville v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error