CaseTrail

Franchise Tax Board of California v. Gilbert P. Hyatt

538 U.S. 488 · Decided April 23, 2003 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Franchise Tax Board of California v. Gilbert P. Hyatt was decided on April 23, 2003 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Miscellaneous interstate conflict” in the Interstate Relations area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
538 U.S. 488 · 123 S. Ct. 1683 · 155 L. Ed. 2d 702 · 2003 U.S. LEXIS 3244
Docket number
02-42
Decided
April 23, 2003
Argued
February 24, 2003
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Sandra Day O'Connor
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
Article IV, Section 1 (full faith and credit clause)
Type of law
Constitution
Decision direction (SCDB)
Unspecifiable what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Franchise Tax Board of California v. Gilbert P. Hyatt, et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 2002-045, docket 2002-045-01.

Other cases on “Miscellaneous interstate conflict”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Article IV, Section 1 (full faith and credit clause)

Same Term, same area (Interstate Relations)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error