Frank v. Gaos
139 S. Ct. 1041 · Decided March 20, 2019 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Frank v. Gaos was decided on March 20, 2019 by a vote of 8–1. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Standing, personal injury” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2018
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 17-961
Case details
- Citations
- 139 S. Ct. 1041 · 203 L. Ed. 2d 404 · 2019 U.S. LEXIS 2089
- Docket number
- 17-961
- Decided
- March 20, 2019
- Argued
- October 31, 2018
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Standing, personal injury
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Unspecifiable what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Majority | |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Majority |
Full case caption
Frank v. Gaos
SCDB identifiers: case 2018-015, docket 2018-015-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Standing, personal injury”
- Hollingsworth v. Perry
- Comcast Corporation v. Caroline Behrend
- Bob Camreta v. Sarah Greene
- Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency
- John F. Kowalski v. John C. Tesmer
- Elk Grove Unified School District and David W. Gordon v. Michael A. Newdow
Cases on the same legal provision: Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-Hill
- Gill v. Whitford
- United States v. Sanchez-Gomez
- New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. City of New York
- Thole v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
- Carney v. Adams
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Yovino v. Rizo
- Nutraceutical Corp. v. Lambert
- Jam v. Int'l Finance Corp.
- Cochise Consultancy Inc. v. U.S.
- Home Depot U.S.A. Inc. v. Jackson
- Smith v. Berryhill
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error