Fredel Williamson v. United States
512 U.S. 594 · Decided June 27, 1994 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Fredel Williamson v. United States was decided on June 27, 1994 unanimously (9–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 512 U.S. 594 · 114 S. Ct. 2431 · 129 L. Ed. 2d 476 · 1994 U.S. LEXIS 4832
- Docket number
- 93-5256
- Decided
- June 27, 1994
- Argued
- April 25, 1994
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Sandra Day O'Connor
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Evidence
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Concurrence | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Special concurrence | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Concurrence | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice David H. Souter | Concurrence | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Fredel Williamson v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 1993-088, docket 1993-088-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure”
- Matthew Wayne Tome v. United States
- United States v. Gary Mezzanatto
- United States v. Guy W. Olano, Jr.
- Joseph Libretti v. United States
- Gloria Zafiro v. United States
- Michael Crosby v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Evidence
- William Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Carrie Jaffee v. Mary Lu Redmond
- United States v. Anthony Salerno
- Johnny Lynn Old Chief v. United States
- General Electric Company v. Robert K. Joiner et Ux.
- United States v. Zolin
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Jimmie Burden, Jr. v. Walter Zant
- Waldemar Ratzlaf and Loretta Ratzlaf v. United States
- Thomas Schiro v. Robert Farley
- Paul Caspari v. Christopher Bohlen
- Clarence Victor v. Nebraska
- United States v. Ralph Stuart Granderson, Jr.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error