CaseTrail

Freeman v. Hewit

329 U.S. 249 · Decided December 16, 1946 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Freeman v. Hewit was decided on December 16, 1946 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Felix Frankfurter wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local government tax” in the Economic Activity area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
329 U.S. 249 · 67 S. Ct. 274 · 91 L. Ed. 265 · 1946 U.S. LEXIS 1616
Docket number
3
Decided
December 16, 1946
Argued
October 8, 1944
Reargued
October 14, 1946
Court era
Vinson Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
6–3
Majority opinion
Felix Frankfurter
How the case arrived
Appeal
Legal provision
Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
Type of law
Constitution
Held unconstitutional
A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice Hugo L. BlackDissent
Justice Stanley F. ReedMajority
Justice Felix FrankfurterMajorityWrote an opinion
Justice William O. DouglasDissentWrote an opinion
Justice Frank MurphyDissent
Justice Robert H. JacksonMajority
Justice Wiley B. RutledgeSpecial concurrenceWrote an opinion
Justice Harold H. BurtonMajority
Chief Justice Fred M. VinsonMajority

Full case caption

Freeman, Trustee, v. Hewit, Director of Gross Income Tax Division

SCDB identifiers: case 1946-017, docket 1946-017-01.

Other cases on “State or local government tax”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error