CaseTrail

Gale Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance

542 U.S. 55 · Decided June 14, 2004 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Gale Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance was decided on June 14, 2004 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Natural resources and environmental protection” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
542 U.S. 55 · 124 S. Ct. 2373 · 159 L. Ed. 2d 137 · 2004 U.S. LEXIS 4379
Docket number
03-101
Decided
June 14, 2004
Argued
March 29, 2004
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Antonin Scalia
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
Administrative Procedure Act or Administrative Orders Review Act
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Gale Norton, Secretary of the Interior, et al. v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 2003-070, docket 2003-070-01.

Other cases on “Natural resources and environmental protection”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Administrative Procedure Act or Administrative Orders Review Act

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error