George Smith v. Lee Robbins
528 U.S. 259 · Decided January 19, 2000 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
George Smith v. Lee Robbins was decided on January 19, 2000 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Indigents, appointment of counsel” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 528 U.S. 259 · 120 S. Ct. 746 · 145 L. Ed. 2d 756 · 2000 U.S. LEXIS 825
- Docket number
- 98-1037
- Decided
- January 19, 2000
- Argued
- October 5, 1999
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Clarence Thomas
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Indigents, appointment of counsel
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Dissent | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Dissent |
Full case caption
George Smith, Warden v. Lee Robbins
SCDB identifiers: case 1999-023, docket 1999-023-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Indigents, appointment of counsel”
- Anthony S. Austin v. United States
- Antonio Dwayne Halbert v. MichiganLaw held unconstitutional
- Rothgery v. Gillespie County
- Murray v. Giarratano
- Mallard v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa
- Cory R. Maples v. Kim T. Thomas
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Hunt-Wesson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board of CaliforniaLaw held unconstitutional
- Jenifer Troxel v. Tommie GranvilleLaw held unconstitutional
- Charles C. Apprendi, Jr. v. New JerseyLaw held unconstitutional
- Don Stenberg v. Leroy CarhartLaw held unconstitutional
- City of Chicago v. Jesus MoralesLaw held unconstitutional
- David Conn and Carol Najera v. Paul L. Gabbert
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Donald H. Brancato v. Priscilla F. Gunn
- Michael C. Antonelli v. Dale Caridine
- Keith Russell Judd v. United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
- Robert E. Prunty v. W. Brooks
- In re Frederick W. Bauer
- Texas v. Francois Daniel Lesage and United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error