Goesaert v. Cleary
335 U.S. 464 · Decided December 20, 1948 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Goesaert v. Cleary was decided on December 20, 1948 by a vote of 6–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Felix Frankfurter wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Sex discrimination in employment” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 335 U.S. 464 · 69 S. Ct. 198 · 93 L. Ed. 2d 163 · 1948 U.S. LEXIS 2715
- Docket number
- 49
- Decided
- December 20, 1948
- Argued
- November 19, 1948
- Court era
- Vinson Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Felix Frankfurter
- Opinion assigned by
- Fred M. Vinson
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Sex discrimination in employment
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Stanley F. Reed | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | |
| Justice Frank Murphy | Dissent | |
| Justice Robert H. Jackson | Majority | |
| Justice Wiley B. Rutledge | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson | Majority |
Full case caption
Goesaert et al. v. Cleary et Al., Members of the Liquor Control Commission of Michigan
SCDB identifiers: case 1948-014, docket 1948-014-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Sex discrimination in employment”
- Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp.
- Cleveland Board of Education v. Lafleur
- Corning Glass Works v. Brennan
- Geduldig v. Aiello
- Turner v. Department of Employment Security of UtahLaw held unconstitutional
- General Electric Co. v. Gilbert
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Daniel v. Family Security Life Insurance Co.
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
- Wheeling Steel Corp. v. GlanderLaw held unconstitutional
- Shelley et Ux. v. Kraemer et Ux.
- Oyama v. CaliforniaLaw held unconstitutional
- Sipuel v. Board of Regents of the University of OklahomaLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Macdougall v. Green
- Adkins v. E. I. Dupont de Nemours & Co., Inc. United States
- Klapprott v. United States
- United States ex Rel. Hirshberg v. Cooke
- United States ex Rel. Johnson v. Shaughnessy
- Hynes v. Grimes Packing Co.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error