CaseTrail

Grady v. Corbin

495 U.S. 508 · Decided May 29, 1990 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Grady v. Corbin was decided on May 29, 1990 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice William J. Brennan Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Double jeopardy” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
495 U.S. 508 · 110 S. Ct. 2084 · 109 L. Ed. 2d 548 · 1990 U.S. LEXIS 2698
Docket number
89-474
Decided
May 29, 1990
Argued
March 21, 1990
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
5–4
Majority opinion
William J. Brennan Jr.
Opinion assigned by
William J. Brennan Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Double jeopardy
Legal provision
Fifth Amendment (double jeopardy)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Grady, District Attorney of Dutchess County v. Corbin

SCDB identifiers: case 1989-083, docket 1989-083-01.

Other cases on “Double jeopardy”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fifth Amendment (double jeopardy)

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error