CaseTrail

Halo Electronics v. Pulse Electronics

579 U.S. 93 · Decided June 13, 2016 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Halo Electronics v. Pulse Electronics was decided on June 13, 2016 unanimously (8–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Patents” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
579 U.S. 93 · 136 S. Ct. 1923 · 195 L. Ed. 2d 278 · 2016 U.S. LEXIS 3776
Docket number
14-1513
Decided
June 13, 2016
Argued
February 23, 2016
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Vacated and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
8–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
John G. Roberts Jr.
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Patents
Legal provision
Patent Act
Type of law
Infrequently litigated statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Halo Electronics v. Pulse Electronics

SCDB identifiers: case 2015-041, docket 2015-041-01.

Other cases on “Patents”

See all

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error