Harvey F. Garlotte v. Kirk Fordice
515 U.S. 39 · Decided May 30, 1995 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Harvey F. Garlotte v. Kirk Fordice was decided on May 30, 1995 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Habeas corpus” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 515 U.S. 39 · 115 S. Ct. 1948 · 132 L. Ed. 2d 36 · 1995 U.S. LEXIS 3620
- Docket number
- 94-6790
- Decided
- May 30, 1995
- Argued
- April 24, 1995
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- Opinion assigned by
- John Paul Stevens
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Habeas corpus
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241–2255 (habeas corpus)
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority |
Full case caption
Harvey F. Garlotte v. Kirk Fordice, Governor of Mississippi
SCDB identifiers: case 1994-064, docket 1994-064-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Habeas corpus”
- Bryan Goeke v. Lynda Ruth Branch
- Robert O'Neal v. Fred McAninch
- Lloyd Schlup v. Paul K. Delo
- William Duncan v. Robert E. Henry
- Carl Thompson v. Patrick Keohane
- Larry Grant Lonchar v. Albert G. Thomas
Cases on the same legal provision: 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241–2255 (habeas corpus)
- Daniel Greene v. Georgia
- Earthy D. Daniels, Jr. v. United States
- Lackawanna County District Attorney v. Edward R. Coss, Jr.
- Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St. Cyr
- Deboris Calcano-Martinez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- George H. Baldwin v. Michael Reese
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- United States v. Reshat Shabani
- Matthew Wayne Tome v. United States
- United States v. Gary Mezzanatto
- Lloyd Schlup v. Paul K. Delo
- William Duncan v. Robert E. Henry
- Robert O'Neal v. Fred McAninch
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error