Hayfield Northern Railroad Co., Inc. v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.
467 U.S. 622 · Decided June 12, 1984 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Hayfield Northern Railroad Co., Inc. v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. was decided on June 12, 1984 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Thurgood Marshall wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal preemption of state legislation or regulation” in the Federalism area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 467 U.S. 622 · 104 S. Ct. 2610 · 81 L. Ed. 2d 527 · 1984 U.S. LEXIS 109
- Docket number
- 82-1579
- Decided
- June 12, 1984
- Argued
- February 21, 1984
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Thurgood Marshall
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue area
- Federalism
- Legal provision
- Interstate Commerce Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority |
Full case caption
Hayfield Northern Railroad Co., Inc., et al. v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.
SCDB identifiers: case 1983-125, docket 1983-125-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal preemption of state legislation or regulation”
- Michigan Canners & Freezers Association, Inc. v. Agricultural Marketing and Bargaining Board
- Franchise Tax Board of California v. United States Postal Service
- Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. Crisp
- Brown v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union Local 54
- Aloha Airlines, Inc. v. Director of Taxation of Hawaii
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Cases on the same legal provision: Interstate Commerce Act
- Thurston Motor Lines, Inc. v. Jordan K. Rand, Ltd.
- Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Commercial Metals Co.
- Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Kalo Brick & Tile Co.
- Southern Railway Co. v. Seaboard Allied Milling Corp.
- Mobil Alaska Pipeline Co. v. United States
- Maislin Industries, U.S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.
Same Term, same area (Federalism)
- Aloha Airlines, Inc. v. Director of Taxation of Hawaii
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanAltered precedent
- South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. Wunnicke
- Michigan Canners & Freezers Association, Inc. v. Agricultural Marketing and Bargaining Board
- Franchise Tax Board of California v. United States Postal Service
- Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. Crisp
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error