CaseTrail

Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.

571 U.S. 99 · Decided December 16, 2013 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co. was decided on December 16, 2013 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Employee Retirement Income Security Act” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
571 U.S. 99 · 134 S. Ct. 604 · 187 L. Ed. 2d 529 · 2013 U.S. LEXIS 9026
Docket number
12-729
Decided
December 16, 2013
Argued
October 15, 2013
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Clarence Thomas
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.

SCDB identifiers: case 2013-010, docket 2013-010-01.

Other cases on “Employee Retirement Income Security Act”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error