CaseTrail

Herring v. New York

422 U.S. 853 · Decided June 30, 1975 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Herring v. New York was decided on June 30, 1975 by a vote of 6–3. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Potter Stewart wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Right to counsel” in the Criminal Procedure area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
422 U.S. 853 · 95 S. Ct. 2550 · 45 L. Ed. 2d 593 · 1975 U.S. LEXIS 84
Docket number
73-6587
Decided
June 30, 1975
Argued
February 26, 1975
Court era
Burger Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Vacated and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
6–3
Majority opinion
Potter Stewart
Opinion assigned by
William O. Douglas
How the case arrived
Appeal
Issue (SCDB)
Right to counsel
Legal provision
Sixth Amendment (right to counsel)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Held unconstitutional
A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Herring v. New York

SCDB identifiers: case 1974-149, docket 1974-149-01.

Other cases on “Right to counsel”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Sixth Amendment (right to counsel)

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error