CaseTrail

Hughes v. Rowe

449 U.S. 5 · Decided November 10, 1980 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Hughes v. Rowe was decided on November 10, 1980 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Attorneys' and officials' fees, compensation, or licenses” in the Attorneys area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
449 U.S. 5 · 101 S. Ct. 173 · 66 L. Ed. 2d 163 · 1980 U.S. LEXIS 1
Docket number
79-6000
Decided
November 10, 1980
Court era
Burger Court
Decision type
Per curiam (no oral argument)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
7–2
Opinion assigned by
William J. Brennan Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Attorneys
Legal provision
Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Awards Act
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice William J. Brennan Jr.Majority
Justice Potter StewartSpecial concurrenceWrote an opinion
Justice Byron R. WhiteConcurrenceWrote an opinion
Justice Thurgood MarshallMajority
Chief Justice Warren E. BurgerJurisdictional dissent
Justice Harry A. BlackmunMajority
Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr.Majority
Justice William H. RehnquistDissentWrote an opinion
Justice John Paul StevensMajority

Full case caption

Hughes v. Rowe et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1980-002, docket 1980-002-01.

Other cases on “Attorneys' and officials' fees, compensation, or licenses”

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error