CaseTrail

Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc.

547 U.S. 28 · Decided March 1, 2006 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. was decided on March 1, 2006 unanimously (8–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area. SCDB codes this decision as formally altering one or more of the Court's own precedents.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
547 U.S. 28 · 126 S. Ct. 1281 · 164 L. Ed. 2d 26 · 2006 U.S. LEXIS 2024
Docket number
04-1329
Decided
March 1, 2006
Argued
November 29, 2005
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Vacated and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
8–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
John Paul Stevens
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Antitrust
Legal provision
Sherman Act
Type of law
Federal statute
Altered precedent
Yes — formally altered the Court's precedent
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Did not participate: Samuel A. Alito Jr..

Full case caption

Illinois Tool Works Inc., et al. v. Independent Ink, Inc.

SCDB identifiers: case 2005-038, docket 2005-038-01.

Other cases on “Antitrust”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Sherman Act

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error