CaseTrail

Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma

140 S. Ct. 768 · Decided February 26, 2020 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma was decided on February 26, 2020 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Employee Retirement Income Security Act” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
140 S. Ct. 768 · 206 L. Ed. 2d 103 · 2020 U.S. LEXIS 1367
Docket number
18-1116
Decided
February 26, 2020
Argued
December 4, 2019
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Samuel A. Alito Jr.
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma

SCDB identifiers: case 2019-024, docket 2019-024-01.

Other cases on “Employee Retirement Income Security Act”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error