CaseTrail

International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. v. Local 134

419 U.S. 428 · Decided January 14, 1975 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. v. Local 134 was decided on January 14, 1975 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Labor-management jurisdictional disputes” in the Unions area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
419 U.S. 428 · 95 S. Ct. 600 · 42 L. Ed. 2d 558 · 1975 U.S. LEXIS 103
Docket number
73-1313
Decided
January 14, 1975
Argued
November 19, 1974
Court era
Burger Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
William H. Rehnquist
Opinion assigned by
Warren E. Burger
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Unions
Legal provision
Administrative Procedure Act or Administrative Orders Review Act
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

International Telephone & Telegraph Corp., Communications Equipment & Systems Division v. Local 134, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1974-021, docket 1974-021-01.

Other cases on “Labor-management jurisdictional disputes”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Administrative Procedure Act or Administrative Orders Review Act

Same Term, same area (Unions)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error