John L. Cheek v. United States
498 U.S. 192 · Decided January 8, 1991 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
John L. Cheek v. United States was decided on January 8, 1991 by a vote of 6–2. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Statutory construction of criminal laws, internal revenue” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 498 U.S. 192 · 111 S. Ct. 604 · 112 L. Ed. 2d 617 · 1991 U.S. LEXIS 348
- Docket number
- 89-658
- Decided
- January 8, 1991
- Argued
- October 3, 1990
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–2
- Majority opinion
- Byron R. White
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Internal Revenue Code
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority |
Did not participate: David H. Souter.
Full case caption
John L. Cheek v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 1990-019, docket 1990-019-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Statutory construction of criminal laws, internal revenue”
- Waldemar Ratzlaf and Loretta Ratzlaf v. United States
- Standefer v. United States
- Michael H. Boulware v. United States
- United States v. Habig
- Marinello v. United States
- Lopez v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Internal Revenue Code
- Cottage Savings Association v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- United States v. Centennial Savings Bank FSB (Resolution Trust Corporation
- Portland Golf Club v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- Davis et Ux. v. United States
- United States v. Dalm
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Indianapolis Power & Light Co.
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Robert Lee Shell v. Mississippi
- Tommy Cage v. Louisiana
- R. Dobie Langenkamp v. C. A. Culp
- Raymond J. Moskal, Sr. v. United States
- Robert S. Minnick v. Mississippi
- Richard Demarest v. James
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error