Johnson v. Massachusetts
390 U.S. 511 · Decided April 1, 1968 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Johnson v. Massachusetts was decided on April 1, 1968 by a vote of 6–3. SCDB codes the disposition as “petition denied or appeal dismissed.” The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “No merits, writ improvidently granted” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 390 U.S. 511 · 88 S. Ct. 1155 · 20 L. Ed. 2d 69 · 1968 U.S. LEXIS 2062
- Docket number
- 702
- Decided
- April 1, 1968
- Argued
- March 6, 1968
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Petition denied or appeal dismissed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Opinion assigned by
- Hugo L. Black
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- No merits, writ improvidently granted
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Writ improvidently granted
- Type of law
- Other
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Dissent | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Abe Fortas | Dissent | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Johnson v. Massachusetts
SCDB identifiers: case 1967-092, docket 1967-092-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “No merits, writ improvidently granted”
- Hanner v. Demarcus et Ux.
- Umans v. United States
- Palmieri v. Florida
- Perez v. California.
- Heider v. Michigan Sugar Co.
- Conway v. California Adult Authority
Cases on the same legal provision: Writ improvidently granted
- Massachusetts v. Painten
- Wainwright v. City of New Orleans
- Miller v. California
- Whitney v. Florida
- Skinner v. Louisiana
- Turner v. New York
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Bohannan v. Arizona ex Rel. Smith
- Umans v. United States
- Will, U.S. District Judge v. United States
- Hackin v. Arizona
- Federal Trade Commission v. Flotill Products, Inc.
- Zwickler v. Koota
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error